4.6 Article

Opioid Stewardship Program and Postoperative Adverse Events: A Difference-in-differences Cohort Study

Journal

ANESTHESIOLOGY
Volume 132, Issue 6, Pages 1558-1568

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003238

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services [HHSM-500-2016-00075C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: A 6-month opioid use educational program consisting of webinars on pain assessment, postoperative and multimodal pain opioid management, safer opioid use, and preventing addiction coupled with on-site coaching and monthly assessments reports was implemented in 31 hospitals. The authors hypothesized the intervention would measurably reduce and/or prevent opioid-related harm among adult hospitalized patients compared to 33 nonintervention hospitals. Methods: Outcomes were extracted from medical records for 12 months before and after the intervention start date. Opioid adverse events, evaluated by opioid overdose, wrong substance given or taken in error, naloxone administration, and acute postoperative respiratory failure causing prolonged ventilation were the primary outcomes. Opioid use in adult patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty or colorectal procedures was also assessed. Differences-in-differences were compared between intervention and nonintervention hospitals. Results: Before the intervention, the incidence SD of opioid overdose, wrong substance given, or substance taken in error was 1 +/- 0.5 per 10,000 discharges, and naloxone use was 117 +/- 13 per 10,000 patients receiving opioids. The incidence of respiratory failure was 42 +/- 10 per 10,000 surgical discharges. A difference-in-differences of -0.2 (99% CI, -1.1 to 0.6, P = 0.499) per 10,000 in opioid overdose, wrong substance given, or substance taken in error and -13.6 (99% CI, -29.0 to 0.0, P = 0.028) per 10,000 in respiratory failure was observed postintervention in the intervention hospitals; however, naloxone administration increased by 15.2 (99% CI, 3.8 to 30.0, P = 0.011) per 10,000. Average total daily opioid use, as well as the fraction of patients receiving daily opioid greater than 90mg morphine equivalents was not different between the intervention and nonintervention hospitals. Conclusions: A 6-month opioid educational intervention did not reduce opioid adverse events or alter opioid use in hospitalized patients. The authors' findings suggest that despite opioid and multimodal analgesia awareness, limited-duration educational interventions do not substantially change the hospital use of opioid analgesics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available