4.6 Article

Differential Ventilation Using Flow Control Valves as a Potential Bridge to Full Ventilatory Support during the COVID-19 Crisis From Bench to Bedside

Journal

ANESTHESIOLOGY
Volume 133, Issue 4, Pages 892-904

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003473

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, ventilator sharing was suggested to increase availability of mechanical ventilation. The safety and feasibility of ventilator sharing is unknown. Methods: A single ventilator in pressure control mode was used with flow control valves to simultaneously ventilate two patients with different lung compliances. The system was first evaluated using high-fidelity human patient simulator mannequins and then tested for 1 h in two pairs of COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure. Patients were matched on positive end-expiratory pressure, fractional inspired oxygen tension, and respiratory rate. Tidal volume and peak airway pressure (P-MAX) were recorded from each patient using separate independent spirometers and arterial blood gas samples drawn at 0, 30, and 60 min. The authors assessed acid-base status, oxygenation, tidal volume, and P(MAX)for each patient. Stability was assessed by calculating the coefficient of variation. Results: The valves performed as expected in simulation, providing a stable tidal volume of 400 ml each to two mannequins with compliance ratios varying from 20:20 to 20:90 ml/cm H2O. The system was then tested in two pairs of patients. Pair 1 was a 49-yr-old woman, ideal body weight 46 kg, and a 55-yr-old man, ideal body weight 64 kg, with lung compliance 27 ml/cm H(2)Oversus35 ml/cm H2O. The coefficient of variation for tidal volume was 0.2 to 1.7%, and for P(MAX)0 to 1.1%. Pair 2 was a 32-yr-old man, ideal body weight 62 kg, and a 56-yr-old woman, ideal body weight 46 kg, with lung compliance 12 ml/cm H(2)Oversus21 ml/cm H2O. The coefficient of variation for tidal volume was 0.4 to 5.6%, and for P(MAX)0 to 2.1%. Conclusions: Differential ventilation using a single ventilator is feasible. Flow control valves enable delivery of stable tidal volume and P(MAX)similar to those provided by individual ventilators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available