4.7 Article

Development of ELISA and chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay for quantification of histamine in drug products and food samples

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 412, Issue 19, Pages 4739-4747

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-020-02730-5

Keywords

Histamine (HA); Histamine drug contamination; Monoclonal antibody (mAb); Indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ic-ELISA); Indirect competitive chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (ic-CLEIA)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31572556, 31873006]
  2. Key Program for International S&T Cooperation Project of Shaanxi Province [2017KW-ZD-10]
  3. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [RFMEFI60417X0198]
  4. FCT I.P, the Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior (MCTES)
  5. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [POCI-01-0145FEDER-007569]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Histamine (HA) is a biogenic amine associated with allergies and food poisoning. It is an important indicator of food freshness and quality. In recent years, a series of medical negligence cases have been reported to be related to the intravenous injection of antibiotics produced via fermentation with fish peptone due to HA contamination. To detect HA efficiently, mouse monoclonal antibody was developed. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) were developed and compared with conventional HPLC analysis. Both immunoassays showed low cross-reactivity, low 50% inhibitive concentration (IC50; 1.2 mu g/mL and 1.1 mu g/mL), low limits of detection (LODs, IC10; 89.0 ng/mL and 73.4 ng/mL), and appreciable recoveries in spiked foods and drugs (from 73.4 to 131.0% and from 77.0 to 119.0%, espectively), demonstrating that the developed methods are sensitive, specific, fast, and reliable for HA detection in complicated real samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available