4.7 Review

Experimental designs for solid-phase microextraction method development in bioanalysis: A review

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 1119, Issue -, Pages 77-100

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2020.04.012

Keywords

Bioanalysis; Experimental design (design of experiments, DoE); Method optimization; Quality by design; Sample treatment; SPME

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review is an update of a previous review in 2009 and covers publications from 2009 to 2019. The review focuses on experimental design, referred to as the design of experiments (DoE), used in developing bioanalytical solid-phase microextraction (SPME) methods. Characteristics of different SPME approaches are illustrated and critically discussed. The literature selection evidences that two-level full factorial designs, with a limited number of factors (<5), are most frequently used for preliminary factors screening. When applying the response surface methodology for the quantitative assessment of factorial effects, few quadratic models were used. The most popular were the rotatable central composite and Box-Benkhen designs. Models including more than four factors, such as fractional factorial designs (including the Plackett-Burman and Taguchi designs), were rarely used. Definitive screening and D-Optimal designs were not reported anywhere in the literature selection. When examining the diagnostic criteria used to evaluate different model's quality and validity, it was apparent the researchers relied heavily on commercial software for experimental design, analysis, and reporting of the results. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available