4.4 Article

Postoperative thyroid hormone supplementation rates following thyroid lobectomy

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 221, Issue 4, Pages 804-808

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.07.001

Keywords

Thyroidectomy; Thyroid lobectomy; Thyroid nodule; Thyroid carcinoma; Postsurgical hypothyroidism

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that thyroid stimulating hormone over goal (TH) is associated with preoperative TSH level, thyroiditis, remnant thyroid volume, and malignancy. The majority of patients with cancer will require thyroid hormone supplementation to achieve TSH goal.
Background: Thyroid lobectomy is performed for symptomatic benign nodules, indeterminate nodules, or low-risk well differentiated thyroid cancer. We aimed to determine factors associated with thyroid stimulating hormone over goal (TH) following lobectomy. Methods: We performed a retrospective single-institution cohort study of patients undergoing thyroid lobectomy from January 2016 to December 2017. TH was defined as need for thyroid hormone in accordance with guidelines. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. Results: One hundred patients were included and 47% developed. TH: 73% of those with cancer, 38% with benign pathology (p = 0.002). Patients with TH were more likely to have thyroiditis 26% versus 3.8% (p = 0.002); higher preoperative TSH: mean 1.88mIU/L (SD 1.17) versus 1.16mIU/L (SD 0.77) (p = 0.0002), and smaller remnant thyroid lobe adjusted for body surface area 2.99ml/m2 versus 3.72ml/m2 (p = 0.003). Conclusions: After thyroid lobectomy, TH is associated with preoperative TSH level, thyroiditis, remnant thyroid volume, and malignancy. The majority of patients with final pathology of carcinoma will require thyroid hormone supplementation to achieve TSH goal. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available