4.3 Article

Comparison of Current Staging Systems for Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 64-71

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1945892420933178

Keywords

endoscopic sinus surgery; external surgery; inverted papilloma; origin site; recurrence; sinonasal; staging system; surgical outcome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, different staging systems for sinonasal IP were compared in terms of recurrence rates, with the Han and Meng systems found to be more accurate in predicting tumor recurrence. Recommendations were made to use the Han staging system before surgery and the Meng system after intraoperative identification of the tumor's origin.
Background A staging system is essential for determining the optimal surgical approach and predicting postoperative outcomes for inverted papilloma (IP). Although staging systems based on the extent to which the location is occupied by an IP have been widely used, an origin site-based classification of IP using unsupervised machine learning algorithms has recently been reported. Objective To determine the most appropriate of five staging systems for sinonasal IP by comparing recurrence rates for each stage according to each of those systems. Methods Eighty-seven patients with sinonasal IP were enrolled in the study. Their tumors were retrospectively categorized according to the Krouse, Oikawa, Cannady, and Han staging systems, which are based on the extent of IP, and the Meng system, which is based on the site of origin. The rates of recurrence for each stage of the five systems were compared. Results Seven of the 87 patients (8.0%) had recurrences during an average 45.5 months (12-138 months) of follow-up. There were significant differences in disease-free survival between the stages specified by Han and Meng (p = 0.027 and p < 0.001, respectively), but not between the stages specified by Krouse, Oikawa, and Cannady (p = 0.236, 0.062, and 0.130, respectively). Cox proportional hazard models revealed that Meng system (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 4.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-17.04) and presence of dysplasia (aHR 7.42, 95% CI 1.15-47.85) were significantly associated with recurrence. Conclusion The staging systems proposed by Han and Meng were found to be accurate in terms of tumor recurrence. We recommend use of the Han staging system before surgery and the Meng system after intraoperative identification of the origin of the tumor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available