4.6 Article

E-Cigarette and Cigarette Use Among US Adolescents: Longitudinal Associations With Marijuana Use and Perceptions

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 58, Issue 6, Pages 854-857

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.01.013

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01CA203809, R01DA031160, R01DA044157]
  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Researchers have shown a connection between e-cigarette use and subsequent cigarette use. This study prospectively examines the connection between e-cigarette use and marijuana use. Methods: This study used data from the Monitoring the Future panel study of 12th graders in 2014 who were followed up 1 year later (n=305). Past-30-day marijuana use and perceived riskiness of marijuana use for 12th graders who used neither e-cigarettes nor cigarettes (78.6%), only e-cigarettes (10.3%), and cigarettes (with or without e-cigarettes; 11.1%) were compared. Data was analyzed in 2019. Results: At baseline, 40.1% of e-cigarette only users, 48.8% of cigarette users, and 13.2% of nonusers reported past-30-day marijuana use at baseline. E-cigarette only users were less likely to perceive any marijuana as risky at follow-up than nonusers (AOR=0.15, 95% CI=0.04, 0.65). Similarly, e-cigarette only users were more likely to report past-30-day marijuana use at follow-up than nonusers (AOR=3.82, 95% CI=1.45, 10.04), as were those who used cigarettes (AOR=7.63, 95% CI=2.65, 21.97). Conclusions: E-cigarette use, even when not in conjunction with cigarette use, may be a marker of marijuana use risk during the transition from adolescence to young adulthood. The e-cigarette and marijuana use link may strengthen in the future with the increasing trend of adolescents vaping marijuana. (C) 2020 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available