Journal
ALLERGY
Volume 76, Issue 1, Pages 191-209Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/all.14494
Keywords
allergy; asthma; biologics; cost-effectiveness; cost utility
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The advent of biologic therapies has revolutionized the treatment of severe atopic disorders, but their high cost presents challenges in terms of long-term sustainability and resource allocation. Utilizing economic analyses can help guide decision-making and prioritization in care, but the conclusions regarding cost-effectiveness of biologic drugs in atopic disorders vary due to inconsistent estimates of health utility benefit. Developing reliable instruments to measure disutility in atopic disorders and indirect costs in atopic diseases is identified as a priority for future research.
The advent of biologic therapies has transformed care for severe atopic disorders but their high cost poses new challenges with regard to long-term sustainability and fair allocation of resources. This article covers the basic concepts of cost-utility analyses and reviews the available literature on cost utility of biologic drugs in atopic disorders. When used within their limits as part of a multi-dimensional assessment, economic analyses can be extremely useful to guide decision-making and prioritization of care. Despite the good quality of most cost-utility analyses conducted for the use of biologics in asthma and other atopic diseases, their conclusions regarding cost-effectiveness are extremely variable. This is mainly due to the use of inconsistent estimates of health utility benefit with therapy. Development of reliable and validated instruments to measure disutility in atopic disorders and measure of indirect costs in atopic disease are identified as a priority for future research.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available