4.6 Article

RPP30, a transcriptional regulator, is a potential pathogenic factor in glioblastoma

Journal

AGING-US
Volume 12, Issue 16, Pages 16155-16171

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/aging.103596

Keywords

glioblastoma; RPP30; age; RNA modification; pathogenic factor

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81672479, 81802994]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)/Research Grants Council (RGC) Joint Research Scheme [81761168038]
  3. Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals' Mission Plan [SML20180501]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Old age has been demonstrated to be a risk factor for GBM, but the underlying biological mechanism is still unclear. We designed this study intending to determine a mechanistic explanation for the link between age and pathogenesis in GBM. Results: The expression of RPP30, an independent prognostic factor in GBM, was negatively correlated with age in both tumor and non-tumor brain samples. However, the post-transcriptional modifications carried out by RPP30 were different in primary GBM and non-tumor brain samples. RPP30 affected protein expression of cancer pathways by performing RNA modifications. Further, we found that RPP30 was related to drug metabolism pathways important in GBM. The decreased expression of RPP30 in older patients might be a pathogenic factor for GBM. Conclusion: This study revealed the role of RPP30 in gliomagenesis and provided the theoretical foundation for targeted therapy. Methods: In total, 616 primary GBM samples and 41 non-tumor brain samples were enrolled in this study. Transcriptome data and clinical information were obtained from the CGGA, TCGA, and GSE53890 databases. Gene Set Variation Analysis and Gene Ontology analyses were the primary analytical methods used in this study. All statistical analyses were performed using R.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available