Journal
ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages -Publisher
WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202003660
Keywords
cathodes; Li-ion batteries; Li-rich layered oxides; oxygen loss; oxygen redox
Categories
Funding
- EPSRC
- SUPERGEN programme
- Henry Royce Institute for Advanced Materials [EP/R00661X/1, EP/S019367/1, EP/R010145/1]
- Faraday Institution [FIRG007, FIRG008]
- EPSRC [EP/S019367/1, EP/S003053/1, EP/L019469/1, EP/R010145/1] Funding Source: UKRI
Ask authors/readers for more resources
It is shown that almost complete eradication of oxygen loss with Ni substitution is due to the presence of a less lithium-rich, more nickel-rich rocksalt shell at the surface of the particles compared with the bulk. Thinner rocksalt shell forms in the case of Ni and Co co-substitution, leading to more abundant oxygen loss. Co doping does not result in a surface shell yet it still suppresses oxygen loss, indicating that two mechanisms exist for oxygen loss suppression.
Lithium-rich transition metal cathodes can deliver higher capacities than stoichiometric materials by exploiting redox reactions on oxygen. However, oxidation of O(2-)on charging often results in loss of oxygen from the lattice. In the case of Li(2)MnO(3)all the capacity arises from oxygen loss, whereas doping with Ni and/or Co leads to the archetypal O-redox cathodes Li[Li0.2Ni0.2Mn0.6]O(2)and Li[Li0.2Ni0.13Co0.13Mn0.54]O-2, which exhibit much reduced oxygen loss. Understanding the factors that determine the degree of reversible O-redox versus irreversible O-loss is important if Li-rich cathodes are to be exploited in next generation lithium-ion batteries. Here it is shown that the almost complete eradication of O-loss with Ni substitution is due to the presence of a less Li-rich, more Ni-rich (nearer stoichiometric) rocksalt shell at the surface of the particles compared with the bulk, which acts as a self-protecting layer against O-loss. In the case of Ni and Co co-substitution, a thinner rocksalt shell forms, and the O-loss is more abundant. In contrast, Co doping does not result in a surface shell yet it still suppresses O-loss, although less so than Ni and Ni/Co doping, indicating that doping without shell formation is effective and that two mechanisms exist for O-loss suppression.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available