3.9 Article

AUTOLOGOUS CHONDROCYTE IMPLANTATION IN BRAZIL

Journal

ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 131-136

Publisher

ATHA COMUNICACAO & EDITORA
DOI: 10.1590/1413-785220202803226503

Keywords

Cartilage; Cell; and Tissue-Based Therapy; Transplantation, Autologous; Chondrocytes

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To describe the first series of cases of autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) in collagen membrane performed in Brazil. Methods: ACI was performed in 12 knees of 11 patients, aged 32.1 +/- 10.9 years, with 5.3 +/- 2.6 cm(2) full-thickness knee cartilage lesions, with a six-month minimum follow-up. Two surgical procedures were performed: arthroscopic cartilage biopsy for isolation and expansion of chondrocytes, which were seeded onto collagen membrane and implanted in the lesion site; the characterization of cultured cells and implant was performed using immunofluorescence for type II collagen (COL2) for cell viability and electron microscopy of the implant. Clinical safety, KOOS and IKDC scores and magnetic resonance imaging were evaluated. We used repeated-measures ANOVA and post-hoc comparisons at alpha = 5%. Results: COL2 was identified in the cellular cytoplasm, cell viability was higher than 95% and adequate distribution and cell adhesion were found in the membrane. The median follow-up was 10.9 months (7 to 19). We had two cases of arthrofibrosis, one of graft hypertrophy and one of superficial infection as complications, but none compromising clinical improvement. KOOS and IKDC ranged from 71.2 +/- 11.44 and 50.72 +/- 14.10, in preoperative period, to 85.0 +/- 4.4 and 70.5 +/- 8.0, at 6 months (p = 0.007 and 0.005). MRI showed regenerated tissue compatible with hyaline cartilage. Conclusion: ACI in collagen membrane was feasible and safe in a short-term follow- up, presenting regenerated formation visualized by magnetic resonance imaging and improved clinical function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available