4.6 Article

Plasma p-tau181 accurately predicts Alzheimer's disease pathology at least 8 years prior to post-mortem and improves the clinical characterisation of cognitive decline

Journal

ACTA NEUROPATHOLOGICA
Volume 140, Issue 3, Pages 267-278

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00401-020-02195-x

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Neuropathology; Braak; Blood biomarkers; p-tau181

Funding

  1. University of Gothenburg
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London
  3. UK Medical Research Council
  4. Alzheimer's Research UK
  5. Alzheimer's Society
  6. BrightFocus Foundation [A2020812F]
  7. Swedish Alzheimer Foundation (Alzheimerfonden) [AF-930627]
  8. Swedish Brain Foundation (Hjarnfonden) [FO2020-0240]
  9. Swedish Dementia Foundation (Demensforbundet)
  10. Agneta Prytz-Folkes and Gosta Folkes Foundation
  11. Gamla Tjanarinnor
  12. Gun and Bertil Stohnes Foundation
  13. Anna Lisa and Brother Bjornsson's Foundation
  14. European Union [752310]
  15. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI19/00155]
  16. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities [IJC2018-037478-I]
  17. Research Centre for Mental Health and Biomedical Research Unit for Dementia
  18. Swedish Research Council
  19. Swedish Alzheimer Foundation
  20. Swedish Brain Foundation
  21. Swedish Research Council [2017-00915]
  22. Swedish Alzheimer Foundation [AF-742881]
  23. Hjarnfonden, Sweden [FO2017-0243]
  24. Swedish government [ALFGBG-715986]
  25. Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine
  26. Swedish Alzheimer Foundation (Alzheimerfonden)
  27. Hjarnfonden, Sweden
  28. Aina (Ann) Wallstroms and Mary-Ann Sjobloms Foundation
  29. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [752310] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
  30. MRC [UKDRI-1003, MR/L016397/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The neuropathological confirmation of amyloid-beta (A beta) plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) remains the gold standard for a definitive diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Nowadays, the in vivo diagnosis of AD is greatly aided by both cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and positron emission tomography (PET) biomarkers. Although highly accurate, their broad implementation is restricted by high cost, limited accessibility and invasiveness. We recently developed a high-performance, ultrasensitive immunoassay for the quantification of tau phosphorylated at threonine-181 (p-tau181) in plasma, which identifies AD pathophysiology with high accuracy. However, it remains unclear whether plasma p-tau181, measured years before the death, can predict the eventual neuropathological confirmation of AD, and successfully discriminates AD from non-AD dementia pathologies. We studied a unique cohort of 115 individuals with longitudinal blood collections with clinical evaluation at 8, 4 and 2 years prior to neuropathological assessment at death. The results demonstrate that plasma p-tau181 associates better with AD neuropathology and Braak staging than a clinical diagnosis 8 years before post-mortem. Moreover, while all patients had a diagnosis of AD dementia during life, plasma p-tau181 proved to discriminate AD from non-AD pathologies with high accuracy (AUC = 97.4%, 95% CI = 94.1-100%) even 8 years before death. Additionally, the longitudinal trajectory of plasma p-tau181 was assessed in all patients. We found that the main increases in plasma p-tau181 occurred between 8 and 4 years prior to death in patients with AD neuropathology and later plateauing. In contrast, non-AD pathologies and controls exhibited minor, albeit significant, increases in p-tau181 up until death. Overall, our study demonstrates that plasma p-tau181 is highly predictive and specific of AD neuropathology years before post-mortem examination. These data add further support for the use of plasma p-tau181 to aid clinical management in primary care and recruitment for clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available