4.8 Article

Revisiting the Active Sites at the MoS2/H2O Interface via Grand-Canonical DFT: The Role of Water Dissociation

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 12, Issue 28, Pages 31401-31410

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c06489

Keywords

MoS2; hydrogen evolution reaction; grand-canonical DFT; water interface; edges; defects; active sites

Funding

  1. Region Auvergne Rhone-Alpes through the project Pack Ambition Recherche 2018 MoSHi
  2. IFP Energies nouvelles [1801167601]
  3. SYSPROD project
  4. AXELERA Pole de Competitivite

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MoS2 is a promising low-cost catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). However, the nature of the active sites remains a subject of debate. By taking the electrochemcal potential explicitly into account using grand-canonical density functional theory (DFT) in combination with the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation, we herein revisit the active sites of 2H-MoS2. In addition to the well-known catalytically active edge sites, also specific point defects on the otherwise inert basal plane provide highly active sites for HER. Given that HER takes place in water, we also assess the reactivity of these active sites with respect to H2O. The thermodynamics of proton reduction as a function of the electrochemical potential reveals that four edge sites and three basal plane defects feature thermodynamic overpotentials below 0.2 V. In contrast to current proposals, many of these active sites involve adsorbed OH. The results demonstrate that even though H2O and OH block active sites, HER can also occur on these blocked sites, reducing protons on surface OH/H2O entities. As a consequence, our results revise the active sites, highlighting the so far overlooked need to take the liquid component (H2O) of the functional interface into account when considering the stability and activity of the various active sites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available