4.4 Article

Revisiting the Middle Eocene Climatic Optimum Carbon Cycle Conundrum With New Estimates of Atmospheric pCO2From Boron Isotopes

Journal

PALEOCEANOGRAPHY AND PALEOCLIMATOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2019PA003713

Keywords

boron isotopes; pCO(2)reconstruction; Middle Eocene Climatic Optimum; carbon cycle; paleoclimate; cryosphere

Funding

  1. Yale Peabody Museum
  2. NERC Postdoctoral Research Fellowship [NE/H016457/1]
  3. NERC Standard Grant [NE/P013112/1]
  4. Leverhulme Early Career Fellowship [ECF-2013-608]
  5. Flint Postdoctoral Fellowship
  6. NERC grants [NE/I005870/1, NE/I005595/1]
  7. NERC [NE/H016457/1, NE/P019048/1, NE/P013112/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Middle Eocene Climatic Optimum (MECO) was a gradual warming event and carbon cycle perturbation that occurred between 40.5 and 40.1 Ma. A number of characteristics, including greater-than-expected deep-sea carbonate dissolution, a lack of globally coherent negative delta C-13 excursion in marine carbonates, a duration longer than the characteristic timescale of carbon cycle recovery, and the absence of a clear trigger mechanism, challenge our current understanding of the Earth system and its regulatory feedbacks. This makes the MECO one of the most enigmatic events in the Cenozoic, dubbed a middle Eocene carbon cycle conundrum. Here we use boron isotopes in planktic foraminifera to better constrain pCO(2)changes over the event. Over the MECO itself, we find that pCO(2)rose by only 0.55-0.75 doublings, thus requiring a much more modest carbon injection than previously indicated by the alkenone delta C-13-pCO(2)proxy. In addition, this rise in pCO(2)was focused around the peak of the 400 kyr warming trend. Before this, considerable global carbonate delta O-18 change was asynchronous with any coherent ocean pH (and hence pCO(2)) excursion. This finding suggests that middle Eocene climate (and perhaps a nascent cryosphere) was highly sensitive to small changes in radiative forcing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available