4.7 Article

The Dynamics of Digits: Calculating Pi with Galperin's Billiards

Journal

MATHEMATICS
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math8040509

Keywords

Galperin billiards; calculating pi; three-body problem; solvable model; integrability; superintegrability; irrational bases

Categories

Funding

  1. MICINN (Spain) [FIS201784114-C2-1-P]
  2. Juan de la Cierva-Formacion fellowship [FJCI-2014-21229]
  3. Juan de la Cierva-Incorporacion fellowship [IJCI-2016-29071]
  4. Spanish grants [MICIIN/FEDER MTM2015-65715-P, MTM2016-80117-P, PGC2018-098676-B-I00]
  5. Catalan grant [2017SGR1374]
  6. National Science Foundation [PHY-1607221, PHY-1912542]
  7. US-Israel Binational Science Foundation [2015616]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In Galperin billiards, two balls colliding with a hard wall form an analog calculator for the digits of the number 7t. This classical, one-dimensional three-body system (counting the hard wall) calculates the digits of 7E in a base determined by the ratio of the masses of the two particles. This base can be any integer, but it can also be an irrational number, or even the base can be 71 itself. This article reviews previous results for Galperin billiards and then pushes these results farther. We provide a complete explicit solution for the balls' positions and velocities as a function of the collision number and time. We demonstrate that Galperin billiard can be mapped onto a two-particle Calogero-type model. We identify a second dynamical invariant for any mass ratio that provides integrability for the system, and for a sequence of specific mass ratios we identify a third dynamical invariant that establishes superintegrability. Integrability allows us to derive some new exact results for trajectories, and we apply these solutions to analyze the systematic errors that occur in calculating the digits of 71 with Galperin billiards, including curious cases with irrational number bases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available