4.3 Article

Prognostic significance of red cell distribution width in bladder cancer

Journal

TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 295-302

Publisher

AME PUBLISHING COMPANY
DOI: 10.21037/tau.2020.03.08

Keywords

Bladder cancer; prognosis; red blood cell distribution width ( RDW); radical cystectomy; systemic inflammation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Bladder cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide. It ranks ninth among all cancers and fourth among cancers in male patients. Recent studies reported that red blood cell (RBC) distribution width (RDW) was a potential predictor in some cancers. This study explored the significance of RDW in patients with bladder cancer after radical cystectomy. Methods: This study involved 169 patients who underwent radical cystectomy between March 2009 and October 2018. The overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to evaluate the prognostic significance of RDW. Results: The patients with bladder cancer were divided into two subgroups according to the RDW value (0.1395). A high RDW value significantly correlated with higher mortality, a decrease in hemoglobin, an increase in C-reactive protein, a decrease in RBC count, and T stage (P<0.05). Statistically significant differences in OS, CSS, and DFS were found between high- and low-RDW groups. Hence, a high RDW value was presumed to be a risk factor for poor prognosis in patients with bladder cancer after radical cystectomy (P<0.001). Conclusions: Patients with a high RDW value had a poor prognosis. Therefore, RDW is a reliable predictor for the prognosis of patients with bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available