4.7 Review

CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 125, Issue 26, Pages 4017-4023

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2014-12-580068

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute [R01CA102646, R01CA116660]
  2. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
  3. Weinberg Research Fund
  4. Leukemia Research Fund
  5. Stand Up To Cancer
  6. St. Baldrick's Pediatric Dream Team Translational Research Grant [SU2C-AACR-DT1113]
  7. American Cancer Society [RSG-14-022-01-CDD]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Relapsed and refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains difficult to treat, with minimal improvement in outcomes seen in more than 2 decades despite advances in upfront therapy and improved survival for de novo ALL. Adoptive transfer of T cells engineered to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) has emerged as a powerful targeted immunotherapy, showing striking responses in highly refractory populations. Complete remission (CR) rates as high as 90% have been reported in children and adults with relapsed and refractory ALL treated with CAR-modified T cells targeting the B-cell-specific antigen CD19. Distinct CAR designs across several studies have produced similar promising CR rates, an encouraging finding. Even more encouraging are durable remissions observed in some patients without additional therapy. Duration of remission and CAR-modified T-cell persistence require further study and more mature follow-up, but emerging data suggest these factors may distinguish CAR designs. Supraphysiologic T-cell proliferation, a hallmark of this therapy, contributes to both efficacy and the most notable toxicity, cytokine release syndrome (CRS), posing a unique challenge for toxicity management. This review will discuss the current landscape of CD19 CAR clinical trials, CRS pathophysiology and management, and remaining challenges.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available