4.5 Article

Self-Concept and Inattention or Hyperactivity-Impulsivity Symptomatology: The Role of Anxiety

Journal

BRAIN SCIENCES
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10040250

Keywords

ADHD; ADHD-presentations; self-concept; anxiety; comorbidity

Categories

Funding

  1. I + D + i project (Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities) [PGC2018-097739-B-I00]
  2. regional project (Government of the Principality of Asturias) [FC-GRUPIN-IDI/2018/000199]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been associated with low levels of self-concept (academic, emotional, social or physical), although this association can differ in the function of the inattention or hyperactivity-impulsivity symptomatology. Furthermore, the relation between ADHD and self-concept can be mediated or moderated by the levels of anxiety. This work is aimed to examine the differential effect of inattention symptomatology and hyperactivity-impulsivity symptomatology on academic, emotional, social and physical self-concept and the mediating or moderating role of anxiety in this relationship. A total of 167 students (70.7% boys and 29.3% girls) aged between 11 and 16 participated in this study. Students' ADHD symptomatology, self-concept in four areas (academic, emotional, social and physical self-concept) and trait anxiety were measured with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children. The results indicate that trait anxiety mediates the relationship between inattention and emotional, social and physical self-concept but does not moderate this relationship. Trait anxiety does not mediate or moderate the relationship between hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms and self-concept. When inattention symptomatology increases, academic self-concept decreases directly, but students' emotional, social and physical self-concept decreases indirectly through trait anxiety.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available