4.3 Article

Radiation Oncology Initial Certification Qualification Examinations: The Resident Experience in 2019

Journal

PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 5-12

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.04.010

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Radiation oncology residents spend substantial time preparing for the IC examinations in 2019, impacting training and health outcomes. There is variation in the quality of internal program physics and radiobiology courses, with support for the development of a consensus radiation oncology curriculum and preference for consolidating the three qualifying examinations into a single written IC examination.
Purpose: To characterize the resident experience preparing for the 2019 American Board of Radiology initial certification (IC) qualifying examinations in radiation oncology. Methods and Materials: The Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology distributed a survey to 360 radiation oncology residents from the 2019 and 2020 graduating classes covering topics pertinent to preparation for the medical physics (MP), radiation and cancer biology (RCB), and clinical radiation oncology (CRO) qualifying examinations. Results: The response rate was 58% (n = 210). In the 12 weeks before the MP and RCB examinations, first-time examinees studied a median of 160 hours (interquartile range, 96 to 270). Residents reported a moderate or significant negative effect on research productivity (3 [2-4]), mental health (3 [2-4]), clinical development (3 [2-4]), and family life (3 [2-4]). Half of surveyed residents (52%, n = 110) used a protected research or elective block to study while an additional 21% (n = 45) used a median of 5 (3-20) vacation days. Residents overall agreed (4 [2-4]) that their program's physics course was important for their preparation but were neutral (3 [2-4]) regarding the value of their program's radiobiology course. Question-based educational resources were most frequently rated as important study resources. Respondents strongly endorsed the development of a consensus radiation oncology curriculum (5 [4-5]) and agreed (4 [3-4]) that consolidation of the MP, RCB, and CRO qualifying examinations into a single written examination would be preferred. Conclusions: Radiation oncology residents dedicate substantial time preparing for the IC examinations at the expense of training- and health-related outcomes. Residents report a wide range in quality of internal program didactic courses in physics and radiobiology, endorse development of a consensus radiation oncology curriculum, and prefer consolidation of the three qualifying examinations into a single written IC examination. We caution the high pass rates seen on the 2019 examinations do not obviate the need for ongoing improvement in radiation oncology graduate medical education and the board certification process. (C) 2020 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available