4.7 Article

Quality Parameters and Consumer Acceptance of Jelly Candies Based on Pomegranate Juice Mollar de Elche

Journal

FOODS
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods9040516

Keywords

Punica granatum; Malus domestica; honey; sensory analysis; descriptive; PDO

Funding

  1. FPU grant from the Spanish Ministry of Education [FPU15/02158]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is an upward trend towards reducing or suppressing additives in foods, as well as reducing the use of E-numbers in labels providing clean label foods. Therefore, the development of confectionary products based exclusively on natural ingredients with antioxidant properties may offer valuable solutions to the confectionery industry. Fruit juices and purees may provide functional and organoleptic properties in jelly candies in a natural way. The consumption of pomegranate fruit and derivative products has increased due to their association with health benefits. The aim of this study was to determine consumer insights about pomegranate-based jellies, cultivar Mollar de Elche, as affected by formulation (100% pomegranate juice or 50%-50% pomegranate juice-apple puree) and type of sweetener (sugar or honey), and to link affective and descriptive data from sensory studies. The most valued quality parameter of pomegranate products, red color (measured by the green-red coordinate, a*), was not negatively affected by jelly preparation. It was determined that the main liking drivers for pomegranate jellies were intense red color and high brightness. The results might be used by pomegranate processing companies to improve their manufacturing protocols and to develop successful products meeting consumer demands and needs. The formulation containing 20% gelatin, pure Mollar de Elche pomegranate juice, 1% citric acid, and sucrose as sweetener provided the best quality of jellies in terms of color, texture, antioxidant capacity, and sensory attributes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available