4.7 Article

Development of an antimicrobial peptide-loaded mineralized collagen bone scaffold for infective bone defect repair

Journal

REGENERATIVE BIOMATERIALS
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages 515-525

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbaa015

Keywords

antibacterial peptides; PLGA microspheres; mineralized collagen scaffold; osteogenic differentiation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31771056, 81671827, 51572144, 61571077, 61871068]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB0704304]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The repair of infective bone defects is a great challenge in clinical work. It is of vital importance to develop a kind of bone scaffold with good osteogenic properties and long-term antibacterial activity for local anti-infection and bone regeneration. A porous mineralized collagen (MC) scaffold containing poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microspheres loaded with two antibacterial synthetic peptides, Pac-525 or KSL-W was developed and characterized via scanning electron microscopy (SEM), porosity measurement, swelling and mechanical tests. The results showed that the MC scaffold embedded with smooth and compact PLGA microspheres had a positive effect on cell growth and also had antibacterial properties. Through toxicity analysis, cell morphology and proliferation analysis and alkaline phosphatase evaluation, the antibacterial scaffolds showed excellent biocompatibility and osteogenic activity. The antibacterial property evaluated with Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli suggested that the sustained release of Pac-525 or KSL-W from the scaffolds could inhibit the bacterial growth aforementioned in the long term. Our results suggest that the antimicrobial peptides-loaded MC bone scaffold has good antibacterial and osteogenic activities, thus providing a great promise for the treatment of infective bone defects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available