4.7 Article

Omenn syndrome associated with a functional reversion due to a somatic second-site mutation in CARD11 deficiency

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 126, Issue 14, Pages 1658-1669

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2015-03-631374

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) [01 EO 0803]
  2. Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SCHW 432/3-1, 145/6-1]
  3. Jose Carreras Leukamie Stiftung [DJCLS R 10/34]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Omenn syndrome (OS) is a severe immunodeficiency associated with erythroderma, lymphoproliferation, elevated IgE, and hyperactive oligoclonal T cells. A restricted T-cell repertoire caused by defective thymic T-cell development and selection, lymphopenia with homeostatic proliferation, and lack of regulatory T cells are considered key factors in OS pathogenesis. We report 2 siblings presenting with cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Pneumocystis jirovecii infections and recurrent sepsis; one developed all clinical features of OS. Both carried homozygous germline mutations in CARD11 (p.Cys150*), impairing NF-kappa B signaling and IL-2 production. A somatic second-site mutation reverting the stop codon to a missense mutation (p.Cys150Leu) was detected in tissue-infiltrating T cells of the OS patient. Expression of p.Cys150Leu in CARD11-deficient T cells largely reconstituted NF-kB signaling. The reversion likely occurred in a prethymic T-cell precursor, leading to a chimeric T-cell repertoire. We speculate that in our patient the functional advantage of the revertant T cells in the context of persistent CMV infection, combined with lack of regulatory T cells, may have been sufficient to favor OS. This first observation of OS in a patient with a T-cell activation defect suggests that severely defective T-cell development or homeostatic proliferation in a lymphopenic environment are not required for this severe immunopathology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available