4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Understanding lay-public perceptions of energy storage technologies: Preliminary results of a questionnaire conducted in Canada

Journal

ENERGY REPORTS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages 249-258

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.03.031

Keywords

Energy storage; Public perceptions; Attitudes; Acceptance

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) as part of the NSERC Energy Storage Technology Network (NEST)
  2. University of Surrey, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, FRSF standard grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

'Grid-scale' energy storage technologies (ESTs) provide energy storage at scales, capacity and power levels necessary to support the operation of electricity grids, particularly those with substantial renewable (e.g., wind and solar) generation capacity. Public perceptions of new and innovative technologies are known to influence their commercial success, yet there is little existing literature into perceptions and antecedents of grid-scale electricity storage among the general public. In this paper, we report on the findings of an online survey distributed to a diverse sample of the Canadian public (N = 1, 022), focusing on perceptions of four specific ESTs (i.e., compressed air energy storage, flywheels, lithium ion batteries, and pumped hydro storage) and the factors that influence intentions to accept ESTs. This research is part of a larger joint-project between researchers at the University of Waterloo and the University of Surrey designed to investigate the similarities and differences in public perceptions of grid-scale ESTs in Canada and the UK. This paper compliments an earlier one that presented the findings for the same survey conducted on a diverse sample of the UK public. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available