4.7 Article

Arthritogenic Alphavirus Vaccines: Serogrouping Versus Cross-Protection in Mouse Models

Journal

VACCINES
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8020209

Keywords

Chikungunya virus; Ross River virus; Mayaro virus; o'nyong nyong virus; Getah virus

Funding

  1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Australia
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia [APP1078468]
  3. Australian Infectious Disease Research Centre
  4. Queensland Government, Australia
  5. Sementis
  6. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  7. Daiichi Sankyo Foundation of Life Science
  8. Australian governments

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chikungunya virus (CHIKV), Ross River virus (RRV), o'nyong nyong virus (ONNV), Mayaro virus (MAYV) and Getah virus (GETV) represent arthritogenic alphaviruses belonging to the Semliki Forest virus antigenic complex. Antibodies raised against one of these viruses can cross-react with other serogroup members, suggesting that, for instance, a CHIKV vaccine (deemed commercially viable) might provide cross-protection against antigenically related alphaviruses. Herein we use human alphavirus isolates (including a new human RRV isolate) and wild-type mice to explore whether infection with one virus leads to cross-protection against viremia after challenge with other members of the antigenic complex. Persistently infected Rag1(-/-)mice were also used to assess the cross-protective capacity of convalescent CHIKV serum. We also assessed the ability of a recombinant poxvirus-based CHIKV vaccine and a commercially available formalin-fixed, whole-virus GETV vaccine to induce cross-protective responses. Although cross-protection and/or cross-reactivity were clearly evident, they were not universal and were often suboptimal. Even for the more closely related viruses (e.g., CHIKV and ONNV, or RRV and GETV), vaccine-mediated neutralization and/or protection against the intended homologous target was significantly more effective than cross-neutralization and/or cross-protection against the heterologous virus. Effective vaccine-mediated cross-protection would thus likely require a higher dose and/or more vaccinations, which is likely to be unattractive to regulators and vaccine manufacturers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available