4.6 Article

Consensus Disturbance Rejection for Linear Multiagent Systems With Directed Switching Communication Topologies

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL OF NETWORK SYSTEMS
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 254-265

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCNS.2019.2903005

Keywords

Consensus disturbance rejection; directed switching topologies; fully distributed; multiagent system (MAS)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61673107, 61722303, 61673104]
  2. General Joint Fund of the Equipment Advance Research Program of Ministry of Education [6141A020223]
  3. Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Networked Collective Intelligence [BM2017002]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20170079]
  5. Australian Research Council [DE180101268, DP170102303]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper addresses the consensus disturbance rejection problem for multiple-input multiple-output linear multiagent systems (MASs) with directed fixed as well as switching communication topologies in the presence of deterministic disturbances. Based on the relative output information among neighboring agents, a controller, which incorporates the consensus error estimator, the state estimator with static coupling strength and the disturbance observer, is given such that consensus tracking could be achieved in the considered MASs under directed switching communication topologies provided that the control parameters are suitably chosen and the average dwell time is larger than a positive threshold, while the disturbances are fully rejected by the designed disturbance observer. Furthermore, by designing a state estimator with adaptive coupling law, a controller is given such that consensus disturbance rejection of MASs with directed fixed topology could be achieved in a fully distributed manner. The obtained theoretical results are finally validated by performing simulations on the unmanned aerial vehicles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available