4.7 Article

Discriminating Origin Tissues of Tumor Cell Lines by Methylation Signatures and Dys-Methylated Rules

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00507

Keywords

methylation signature; dys-methylated pattern; cell line; rule; classification

Funding

  1. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project [2017SHZDZX01]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC0910403]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31701151, 61701298]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [17ZR1412500]
  5. Shanghai Sailing Program [16YF1413800]
  6. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [2016245]
  7. fund of the key Laboratory of Stem Cell Biology of Chinese Academy of Sciences [201703]
  8. Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province [2018B020203003]
  9. Guangzhou science and technology planning project [201707020007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DNA methylation is an essential epigenetic modification for multiple biological processes. DNA methylation in mammals acts as an epigenetic mark of transcriptional repression. Aberrant levels of DNA methylation can be observed in various types of tumor cells. Thus, DNA methylation has attracted considerable attention among researchers to provide new and feasible tumor therapies. Conventional studies considered single-gene methylation or specific loci as biomarkers for tumorigenesis. However, genome-scale methylated modification has not been completely investigated. Thus, we proposed and compared two novel computational approaches based on multiple machine learning algorithms for the qualitative and quantitative analyses of methylation-associated genes and their dys-methylated patterns. This study contributes to the identification of novel effective genes and the establishment of optimal quantitative rules for aberrant methylation distinguishing tumor cells with different origin tissues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available