4.7 Article

Experimental and Model-Based Analysis to Optimize Microalgal Biomass Productivity in a Pilot-Scale Tubular Photobioreactor

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00453

Keywords

microalgal cultivation; coarse-grained modeling; light limitation; temperature; biomass productivity optimization; Nannochloropsis

Funding

  1. Free State of Thuringia, Germany
  2. European Union [2015 FE 9151, 2015 FE 9149]
  3. EFR-EOP 2014-2020
  4. University of Applied Sciences Jena

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A dynamic coarse-grained model of microalgal growth considering light availability and temperature under discontinuous bioprocess operation was parameterized using experimental data from 15 batch cultivations of Nannochloropsis granulata in a pilot-scale tubular photobioreactor. The methodology applied consists of a consecutive two-step model parameter estimation using pooled, clustered and reorganized data to obtain initial estimates and multi-experiment fitting to obtain the final estimates, which are: maximum specific growth rate mu(max) = 1.56 d(-1), specific photon half-saturation constant K-S,K-ph = 1.89 mol(ph)g(X)(-1)d(-1), specific photon maintenance coefficient m(ph) = 0.346 molphgX-1d-1 and the cardinal temperatures T-min = 2.3 degrees C, T-opt = 27.93 degrees C and T-max = 32.59 degrees C. Biomass productivity prediction proved highly accurate, expressed by the mean absolute percent error MAPE = 7.2%. Model-based numerical optimization of biomass productivity for repeated discontinuous operation with respect to the process parameters cultivation cycle time, inoculation biomass concentration and temperature yielded productivity gains of up to 35%. This optimization points to best performance under continuous operation. The approach successfully applied here to small pilot-scale confirms an earlier one to lab-scale, indicating its transferability to larger scale tubular photobioreactors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available