4.7 Article

Early Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Machine Learning Method

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00254

Keywords

hepatocellular carcinoma; early diagnosis; cirrhosis; REOs; mRMR; support vector machine

Funding

  1. National Nature Scientific Foundation of China [61772119]
  2. Sichuan Provincial Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [20JCQN0262]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a serious cancer which ranked the fourth in cancer-related death worldwide. Hence, more accurate diagnostic models are urgently needed to aid the early HCC diagnosis under clinical scenarios and thus improve HCC treatment and survival. Several conventional methods have been used for discriminating HCC from cirrhosis tissues in patients without HCC (CwoHCC). However, the recognition successful rates are still far from satisfactory. In this study, we applied a computational approach that based on machine learning method to a set of microarray data generated from 1091 HCC samples and 242 CwoHCC samples. The within-sample relative expression orderings (REOs) method was used to extract numerical descriptors from gene expression profiles datasets. After removing the unrelated features by using maximum redundancy minimum relevance (mRMR) with incremental feature selection, we achieved 11-gene-pair which could produce outstanding results. We further investigated the discriminate capability of the 11-gene-pair for HCC recognition on several independent datasets. The wonderful results were obtained, demonstrating that the selected gene pairs can be signature for HCC. The proposed computational model can discriminate HCC and adjacent non-cancerous tissues from CwoHCC even for minimum biopsy specimens and inaccurately sampled specimens, which can be practical and effective for aiding the early HCC diagnosis at individual level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available