4.7 Article

Evidence accumulation during perceptual decisions in humans varies as a function of dorsal frontoparietal organization

Journal

NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR
Volume 4, Issue 8, Pages 844-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-0863-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP150100986, DP180102066, FT130100589]
  2. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [APP1154378]
  3. Sylvia and Charles Viertel Foundation
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council [1050504]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

How efficiently humans make perceptual decisions varies between people. Based on EEG and structural and functional MRI data, Brosnan et al. suggest a role for dorsal frontoparietal network connectivity in the speed of perceptual decisions. Animal neurophysiological studies have identified neural signals within dorsal frontoparietal areas that trace a perceptual decision by accumulating sensory evidence over time and trigger action upon reaching a threshold. Although analogous accumulation-to-bound signals are identifiable on extracranial human electroencephalography, their cortical origins remain unknown. Here neural metrics of human evidence accumulation, predictive of the speed of perceptual reports, were isolated using electroencephalography and related to dorsal frontoparietal network (dFPN) connectivity using diffusion and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. The build-up rate of evidence accumulation mediated the relationship between the white matter macrostructure of dFPN pathways and the efficiency of perceptual reports. This association between steeper build-up rates of evidence accumulation and the dFPN was recapitulated in the resting-state networks. Stronger connectivity between dFPN regions is thus associated with faster evidence accumulation and speeded perceptual decisions. Our findings identify an integrated network for perceptual decisions that may be targeted for neurorehabilitation in cognitive disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available