4.5 Article

Fish body sizes change with temperature but not all species shrink with warming

Journal

NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages 809-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-1171-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ARC [DP170104240]
  2. UTAS visiting scholars fellowship
  3. ARC Future Fellowship
  4. Marine Biodiversity Hub through the Australian Government's National Environmental Science Programme (NESP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ectotherms generally shrink under experimental warming, but whether this pattern extends to wild populations is uncertain. We analysed ten million visual survey records, spanning the Australian continent and multiple decades and comprising the most common coastal reef fishes (335 species). We found that temperature indeed drives spatial and temporal changes in fish body size, but not consistently in the negative fashion expected. Around 55% of species were smaller in warmer waters (especially among small-bodied species), while 45% were bigger. The direction of a species' response to temperature through space was generally consistent with its response to temperature increase through time at any given location, suggesting that spatial trends could help forecast fish responses to long-term warming. However, temporal changes were about ten times faster than spatial trends (4% versus 40% body size change per 1 degrees C change through space and time, respectively). The rapid and variable responses of fish size to warming may herald unexpected impacts on ecosystem restructuring, with potentially greater consequences than if all species were shrinking. In 355 coastal coral reef fish species, body size changed with warming, but the direction of a species' body size response to warming through time was generally consistent with its response to temperature changes through space, rather than generally negative.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available