4.6 Article

Ultrabright fluorescent nanoscale labels for the femtomolar detection of analytes with standard bioassays

Journal

NATURE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages 518-530

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41551-020-0547-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET-1512043, CBET-1900277]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01DE027098, R01CA141521]
  3. Center for Multiple Myeloma Nanotherapy [U54 CA199092]
  4. Barnes-Jewish Hospital Research Foundation [3706]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The detection and quantification of low-abundance molecular biomarkers in biological samples is challenging. Here, we show that a plasmonic nanoscale construct serving as an 'add-on' label for a broad range of bioassays improves their signal-to-noise ratio and dynamic range without altering their workflow and readout devices. The plasmonic construct consists of a bovine serum albumin scaffold with approximately 210 IRDye 800CW fluorophores (with a fluorescence intensity approximately 6,700-fold that of a single 800CW fluorophore), a polymer-coated gold nanorod acting as a plasmonic antenna and biotin as a high-affinity biorecognition element. Its emission wavelength can be tuned over the visible and near-infrared spectral regions by modifying its size, shape and composition. It improves the limit of detection in fluorescence-linked immunosorbent assays by up to 4,750-fold and is compatible with multiplexed bead-based immunoassays, immunomicroarrays, flow cytometry and immunocytochemistry methods, and it shortens overall assay times (to 20 min) and lowers sample volumes, as shown for the detection of a pro-inflammatory cytokine in mouse interstitial fluid and of urinary biomarkers in patient samples. A plasmonic nanoscale construct serving as a customizable 'add-on' fluorescent label improves the signal-to-noise ratio and dynamic range of a range of fluorescence-based bioassays.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available