4.6 Article

Robotically handled whole-tissue culture system for the screening of oral drug formulations

Journal

NATURE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages 544-559

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41551-020-0545-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [EB-000244]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1096734]
  3. Swiss National Foundation
  4. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1096734] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monolayers of cancer-derived cell lines are widely used in the modelling of the gastrointestinal (GI) absorption of drugs and in oral drug development. However, they do not generally predict drug absorption in vivo. Here, we report a robotically handled system that uses large porcine GI tissue explants that are functionally maintained for an extended period in culture for the high-throughput interrogation (several thousand samples per day) of whole segments of the GI tract. The automated culture system provided higher predictability of drug absorption in the human GI tract than a Caco-2 Transwell system (Spearman's correlation coefficients of 0.906 and 0.302, respectively). By using the culture system to analyse the intestinal absorption of 2,930 formulations of the peptide drug oxytocin, we discovered an absorption enhancer that resulted in a 11.3-fold increase in the oral bioavailability of oxytocin in pigs in the absence of cellular disruption of the intestinal tissue. The robotically handled whole-tissue culture system should help advance the development of oral drug formulations and might also be useful for drug screening applications. A robotically handled culture system using porcine gastrointestinal tissue explants for the high-throughput interrogation of the gastrointestinal tract predicts the absorption of oral drugs in the human gut better than Caco-2 Transwells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available