4.2 Article

Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ-SP) in school-age children

Journal

CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages 675-682

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cch.12357

Keywords

actigraphy; ActiSleep monitor; CSHQ; schoolchildren; sleep disorders; sleep quality indicators

Funding

  1. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness-Carlos III Health Institute
  2. FEDER funds [FIS PI12/02400, FIS PI12/00761]
  3. Research Network on Preventative Activities and Health Promotion [RD12/0005/0009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundSleep disorders in schoolchildren are a common problem worldwide, and when are not adequately diagnosed and treated, their negative impact on daytime functioning may be significant. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ). MethodsParticipants were 286 school-aged children from a community-based sample, aged 4 to 7years. The sleep behaviour was evaluated using the CSHQ and actigraphy (ActiSleep monitor). The CSHQ was adapted to the Spanish language. The internal consistency of the questionnaire and the test-retest reliability between scores at baseline and three-weeks-later were estimated. Associations between CSHQ items and accelerometer sleep quality indicators were used as indicators of concurrent validity. ResultsCronbach's alpha coefficients for the subscales ranged from 0.60 to 0.81, and 0.81 for the full scale; the intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.56 to 0.81. A moderate correlation was observed in sleep latency and awakenings measurements using both parents' reported sleep habits (CSHQ-SP) and sleep quality indicators (ActiSleep). ConclusionsThe CSHQ-SP has demonstrated adequate psychometric properties, and it serves as a useful instrument for clinical and research setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available