4.5 Review

Choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvents (Ch-DESs) as promising green solvents for phenolic compounds extraction from bioresources: state-of-the-art, prospects, and challenges

Journal

BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages 2949-2962

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-020-00753-7

Keywords

Phenolic compounds; Extraction; Ch-DESs; Bioresources

Funding

  1. Shaoguan University key research project [SZ2016KJ02]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201708440546]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review summarizes the latest research on the extraction of phenolic compounds from various bioresources using Ch-DESs. The impact factors, kinetic modeling, and chemical mechanisms of the process are thoroughly analyzed and discussed, along with the prospects and challenges of commercializing the extraction of phenolic compounds from bioresources using Ch-DESs.
As the demand for phenolic compounds in pharmaceutical, food, nutraceutical, and cosmetic production is escalating, recovery of phenolic compounds from bioresources has been receiving great concerns from the scientific community. Renewable, environmentally benign, and biocompatible choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvents (Ch-DESs) are considered potential alternatives to conventional solvents in phenolic compound extraction. In the past 2 years, numerous innovative studies centered on phenolic compound extraction using Ch-DESs and process variable optimization have been explored. Thus, this review aims to summarize the updated state-of-the-art effort dedicated to phenolic compounds extraction from various bioresources using Ch-DESs. Furthermore, impact factors, kinetic modeling, and chemical mechanisms of the process are thoroughly analyzed and discussed. Finally, prospects and challenges in commercialization of phenolic compound extraction from bioresources using Ch-DESs are indicated and extensively discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available