4.7 Article

The Effects of Flood, Drought, and Flood Followed by Drought on Yield in Cotton

Journal

AGRONOMY-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy10040555

Keywords

waterlogging; water deficit; yield loss; irrigation; drainage

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51861125203, U1911204, 51909286]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0405900]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [19lgpy255]
  4. National Research program of Guangzhou Water Authority [2017-28]
  5. Project for Creative Research from Guangdong Water Resources Department [2019]
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M643308]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cotton suffers from alternations of flood and drought in China. A lysimeter trial was conducted to investigate the responses of various cotton yield indices under water-stress treatments including, flood (five-day, eight-day), drought (10-day, 15-day), and five-day flood followed by 10-day drought, during the flowering and boll-forming stage. The results showed that the seed cotton yield was significantly (p < 0.05) reduced under all water-stress treatments, while the harvest index was not affected under any treatment. Significant decreases in dry matter yield, boll number, and boll hull mass were detected under flood treatments but not under drought treatments. The percentage cotton yield losses per day induced by flood and drought were 6.22% and 2.48%, respectively. Under water stress, the associations between seed cotton yield and relevant yield indices were weakened, but yield losses were still strongly related to the decreases in dry matter yield and boll number. Flood followed by drought caused significant reductions in all yield indices except harvest index; however, the reduction was much lower than the additive reductions induced by flood and drought. These results provide bases for scheduling irrigation and drainage under climate change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available