4.5 Article

Genotypic Variation in Spatial Distribution of Fe in Rice Grains in Relation to Phytic Acid Content and Ferritin Gene Expression

Journal

RICE SCIENCE
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 227-236

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.rsci.2020.04.005

Keywords

bio-fortification; iron accumulation; ferritin; tissue-specific localization; iron deficit population

Funding

  1. Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rice varieties having high Fe concentration in the endospermic region can be used as a good source for Fe deficit population. In this study, 303 Oryza sativa varieties and 1 Oryza rufipogon accession were assessed for spatial Fe accumulation in grains by Prussian blue staining method. Spatial ferritin protein distribution in grains was visualized by immunohistochemistry, and ferritin expression was assessed in selected rice varieties using semi-quantitative reverse transcription PCR. Three popular rice varieties, namely Sarjoo 52, Madhukar and Jalmagna, and the O. rufipogon variety showed Fe in all the regions of grains, and the highest Fe concentration was observed in the embryo region. Some high-yielding varieties like Swarna, Swarna Sub 1, CSR13 and NDRR359 had lower Fe concentration in the embryo region. The highest Fe concentration was detected in O. rufipogon (49.8 mu g/g), followed by Sarjoo 52 (26.1 mu g/g) and Madhukar (25.7 mu g/g). Phytic acid concentration was the minimum in O. rufipogon (5.75 mg/g) followed by Sarjoo 52 (5.83 mg/g). Western blot and semi-quantitative reverse transcription PCR showed higher expression of ferritin gene in O. rufipogon, Sarjoo 52 and Madhukar. In conclusion, O. rufipogon and Sarjoo 52 had higher Fe concentration in the embryo regions as well as endosperm and aleurone layer, whereas the other varieties had lower Fe concentration in the endosperm. Sarjoo 52 could be used as a donor in the rice breeding program for the generation of new varieties with elevated grain Fe concentration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available