4.7 Article

A Multidisciplinary Pulmonary Embolism Response Team Initial 30-Month Experience With a Novel Approach to Delivery of Care to Patients With Submassive and Massive Pulmonary Embolism

Journal

CHEST
Volume 150, Issue 2, Pages 384-393

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.03.011

Keywords

deep vein thrombosis; pulmonary embolism; rapid response team; thrombolysis; thrombosis

Funding

  1. Diagnostica Stago
  2. Siemens Healthcare
  3. Janssen Pharmaceuticals
  4. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  5. Abbott Vascular
  6. Atrium
  7. Lutonix/BARD
  8. The Medicines Company

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Integrating newly developed tests and treatments for severe pulmonary embolism (PE) into clinical care requires coordinated multispecialty collaboration. To meet this need, we developed a new paradigm: a multidisciplinary Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT). In this report, we provide the first longitudinal analysis of patients treated by a PERT. METHODS: Our PERT includes specialists in cardiovascular medicine and surgery, emergency medicine, hematology, pulmonary/critical care, and radiology, and is organized as a rapid response team. We prospectively captured clinical, therapeutic, and outcome data at PERT activation and during follow-up periods up to 365 days. We analyzed data collectively, and as five mutually exclusive 6-month periods. We performed Fisher exact tests and regression analysis to test for trend. RESULTS: In 30 months, there were 394 unique PERT activations, 314 (80%) for confirmed PE. PERT activations increased by 16% every 6 months. Most confirmed PEs were submassive (n = 143, 46%) or massive (n = 80, 26%). The PERT treated a relatively large proportion of patients with PE and systemic or catheter-directed thrombolysis (n = 35, 11%), though the most common treatment was anticoagulation alone (n = 215, 69%). Hemorrhagic complications were rare overall, especially among patients treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis. The all-cause 30-day mortality of PERT patients with confirmed PE was 12%. CONCLUSIONS: We report our initial 30-month experience with a novel multidisciplinary PERT that rapidly engages multiple specialists to deliver efficient, organized, and evidence-based care to patients with high-risk PE. The PERT paradigm was rapidly adopted and may become a new standard of care for patients with PE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available