4.7 Review

The Durability of Alkali-Activated Materials in Comparison with Ordinary Portland Cements and Concretes: A Review

Journal

ENGINEERING
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages 695-706

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2019.08.019

Keywords

Alkali-activated materials; Geopolymer; Durability; Ordinary Portland cement; Deterioration mechanism

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778003, 51878263, 51608004]
  2. Opening Foundation of State Key Laboratory of High Performance Civil Engineering Materials [2018CEM002]
  3. Anhui Provincial Education Department [gxfxZD2016134]
  4. Anhui Province Higher Education Revitalization Program [11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

China is the largest producer and user of ordinary Portland cement (OPC), and the rapid growth of infrastructure development demands more sustainable building materials for concrete structures. Alkali-activated materials (AAMs) are a new type of energy-saving and environmentally friendly building material with a wide range of potential applications. This paper compares the durability of AAMs and OPC-based materials under sulfate attack, acid corrosion, carbonation, and chloride penetration. Different AAMs have shown distinct durability properties due to different compositions being formed when different raw materials are used. According to the calcium (Ca) concentration of the raw materials, this paper interprets the deterioration mechanisms of three categories of AAMs: calcium-free, low-calcium, and calcium-rich. Conflicts found in the most recent research are highlighted, as they raise concerns regarding the consistence and long-term properties of AAMs. Nevertheless, AAMs show better durability performances than OPC-based materials in general. (C) 2020 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier LTD on behalf of Chinese Academy of Engineering and Higher Education Press Limited Company. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available