4.4 Article

Reclassification of genetic variants in children with long QT syndrome

Journal

MOLECULAR GENETICS & GENOMIC MEDICINE
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1300

Keywords

ACMG; cardiogenetics; long QT syndrome; Schwartz score; variant classification

Funding

  1. Institute of Human Genetics
  2. German Heart Center Munich

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Genes encoding cardiac ion channels or regulating proteins have been associated with the inherited form of long QT syndrome (LQTS). Complex pathophysiology and missing functional studies, however, often bedevil variant interpretation and classification. We aimed to evaluate the rate of change in variant classification based on current interpretation standards and dependent on clinical findings. Methods Medical charts of children with a molecular genetic diagnosis of LQTS presenting at our centers were retrospectively reviewed. Reinterpretation of originally reported variants in genes associated with LQTS was performed based on current knowledge (March 2019) and according to the Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants by the ACMG 2015. Results About 84 distinct (likely) pathogenic variants identified in 127 patients were reinterpreted. In 12 variants (12/84, 14.3%), classification changed from (likely) pathogenic to variant of unknown significance (VUS). One of these variants was a hypomorphic allele escaping the standard variant classification. Individuals with variants that downgraded to VUS after reevaluation showed significantly lower Schwartz scores and QTc intervals compared to individuals with unchanged variant characterization. Conclusion This finding confirms genetic variant interpretation as a dynamic process and underlines the importance of ongoing genetic counseling, especially in LQTS patients with minor clinical criteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available