4.4 Article

A novel homozygous nonsense ZP1 variant causes human female infertility associated with empty follicle syndrome (EFS)

Journal

MOLECULAR GENETICS & GENOMIC MEDICINE
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1269

Keywords

empty follicle syndrome (EFS); in vitro fertilization (IVF); whole-exome sequencing (WES); zona pellucida (ZP); ZP1

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31970793]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2019YFA0802600]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [1908085J28]
  4. Key R&D program of Anhui Province [201904a07020050]
  5. Scientific Research Foundation of the Institute for Translational Medicine of Anhui Province [SRFITMAP 2017zhyx29]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2070000156]
  7. USTC [KY9100000001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Empty follicle syndrome (EFS) is a rare but severe condition in which no oocyte is recovered in female patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) after sufficient ovarian response to hormonal trigger. Accumulating evidence highlights the genetic basis of EFS occurrence. Methods: In this study, we report a patient with primary infertility showing the characteristics of EFS from a consanguineous family. Under the treatment of assisted reproductive technique (ART), no oocyte was retrieved following the aspiration of mature follicles. Through whole-exome sequencing (WES), we discovered a novel recessively transmitted mutation in ZP1 (c.769 C>T, p. Q257*). Results: In vitro Co-immunoprecipitation assays showed that mutant ZP1 protein failed to interact with either ZP2 or ZP3, which explains the degenerated oocytes in the patient with EFS. Conclusion: Together, our data further expand the spectrum of ZP1 mutations that are associated with human EFS and thus provide novel insight into the diagnosis of EFS patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available