4.7 Article

Textural Quantification and Classification of Drill Cores for Geometallurgy: Moving Toward 3D with X-ray Microcomputed Tomography (μCT)

Journal

NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 3547-3565

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11053-020-09685-5

Keywords

X-ray computed micro-tomography (mu CT); Machine learning; Texture quantification; Local binary pattern; Co-occurrence matrices

Funding

  1. European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [722677]
  2. Academy of Finland through the RAMI infrastructure project [293109]
  3. Lulea University of Technology
  4. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [722677] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
  5. Academy of Finland (AKA) [293109, 293109] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Texture is one of the critical parameters that affect the process behavior of ore minerals. Traditionally, texture has been described qualitatively, but recent works have shown the possibility to quantify mineral textures with the help of computer vision and digital image analysis. Most of these studies utilized 2D computer vision to evaluate mineral textures, which is limited by stereological error. On the other hand, the rapid development of X-ray microcomputed tomography (mu CT) has opened up new possibilities for 3D texture analysis of ore samples. This study extends some of the 2D texture analysis methods, such as association indicator matrix (AIM) and local binary pattern (LBP) into 3D to get quantitative textural descriptors of drill core samples. The sensitivity of the methods to textural differences between drill cores is evaluated by classifying the drill cores into three textural classes using methods of machine learning classification, such as support vector machines and random forest. The study suggested that both AIM and LBP textural descriptors could be used for drill core classification with overall classification accuracy of 84-88%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available