4.6 Article

Immune Cytolytic Activity for Comprehensive Understanding of Immune Landscape in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Journal

CANCERS
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers12051221

Keywords

hepatocellular carcinoma; cytolytic activity; tumor infiltrating lymphocyte; TCGA

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01CA160688]
  2. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [P30CA016056]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cytolytic activity score (CYT), defined by granzyme A and perforin expression, is a useful marker for underlying immunity. We hypothesized that CYT-high hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) have stronger immunogenicity and favorable tumor microenvironments, which would result in better clinical outcomes, using the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) cohort with 371 patients with HCC. We found CYT-high HCCs were associated with higher expressions of the apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic polypeptide-like 3 (APOBEC3), well-known mutagenic enzymes. Further, higher numbers of anti-cancer immune cells, such as CD8+ T cells and M1 macrophages, were infiltrated in CYT-high HCCs. Major T cell exhaustion markers were expressed significantly higher in CYT-high HCCs, likely as a negative feedback loop. Additionally, CYT-high HCCs strongly enriched gene sets related with enhanced immune activity. With strong immunity, patients with CYT-high HCCs had significantly longer disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.03 and <0.01). Furthermore, when the OS is stratified by exhaustion marker expressions, the CYT-high/exhaustion-low group had the best and CYT-low/exhaustion-high groups had the worst OS. Lastly, high CYT was an independent protective factor for prognosis. In conclusion, CYT-high HCCs were associated with enhanced immunity and better survival. Our findings suggest that proper identification of tumor-immune microenvironments could stratify the patients for appropriate treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available