4.7 Article

MSIsensor-pro: Fast, Accurate, and Matched-normal-sample-free Detection of Microsatellite Instability

Journal

GENOMICS PROTEOMICS & BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 65-71

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gpb.2020.02.001

Keywords

Microsatellite; Polymerase slippage; Multinomial distribution; Microsatellite instability; Tumor

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC0910400, 2017YFC0907500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31671372, 61702406, 31701739, 31970317]
  3. National Science and Technology Major Project of China [2018ZX10302205]
  4. World-Class Universities and the Characteristic Development Guidance Funds for the Central Universities
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M623178, 2017M623188]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a key biomarker for cancer therapy and prognosis. Tra-ditional experimental assays are laborious and time-consuming, and next-generation sequencing -based computational methods do not work on leukemia samples, paraffin-embedded samples, or patient-derived xenografts/organoids, due to the requirement of matched normal samples. Herein, we developed MSIsensor-pro, an open-source single sample MSI scoring method for research and clinical applications. MSIsensor-pro introduces a multinomial distribution model to quantify poly-merase slippages for each tumor sample and a discriminative site selection method to enable MSI detection without matched normal samples. We demonstrate that MSIsensor-pro is an ultrafast, accurate, and robust MSI calling method. Using samples with various sequencing depths and tumor purities, MSIsensor-pro significantly outperformed the current leading methods in both accuracy and computational cost. MSIsensor-pro is available at https://github.com/xjtu-omics/msisensor-pro and free for non-commercial use, while a commercial license is provided upon request.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available