4.8 Article

Computational search for magnetic and non-magnetic 2D topological materials using unified spin-orbit spillage screening

Journal

NPJ COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41524-020-0319-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Standards and Technology [TG-DMR 190095]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two-dimensional topological materials (2D TMs) have a variety of properties that make them attractive for applications including spintronics and quantum computation. However, there are only a few such experimentally known materials. To help discover new 2D TMs, we develop a unified and computationally inexpensive approach to identify magnetic and non-magnetic 2D TMs, including gapped and semi-metallic topological classifications, in a high-throughput way using density functional theory-based spin-orbit spillage, Wannier-interpolation, and related techniques. We first compute the spin-orbit spillage for the similar to 1000 2D materials in the JARVIS-DFT dataset, resulting in 122 materials with high-spillage values. Then, we use Wannier-interpolation to carry-out Z(2), Chern-number, anomalous Hall conductivity, Curie temperature, and edge state calculations to further support the predictions. We identify various topologically non-trivial classes such as quantum spin-Hall insulators, quantum anomalous-Hall insulators, and semimetals. For a few predicted materials, we run G(0)W(0)+SOC and DFT+U calculations. We find that as we introduce many-body effects, only a few materials retain non-trivial band-topology, suggesting the importance of high-level density functional theory (DFT) methods in predicting 2D topological materials. However, as an initial step, the automated spillage screening and Wannier-approach provide useful predictions for finding new topological materials and to narrow down candidates for experimental synthesis and characterization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available