4.8 Article

Designer, injectable gels to prevent transplanted Schwann cell loss during spinal cord injury therapy

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 6, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz1039

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [5R01EB027666, 1R21NS114549, 5R01HL142718, R01EB027171]
  2. Stanford Bio-X Interdisciplinary Initiative
  3. Coulter Foundation
  4. Wings for Life [WFL-US-020/14]
  5. Spinal Research (UK)
  6. Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute at Stanford University
  7. Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials Postdoctoral Fellowship
  8. Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute Interdisciplinary Postdoctoral Fellowship
  9. Stanford Bio-X Interdisciplinary Graduate Fellowship
  10. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1542152]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transplantation of patient-derived Schwann cells is a promising regenerative medicine therapy for spinal cord injuries; however, therapeutic efficacy is compromised by inefficient cell delivery. We present a materials-based strategy that addresses three common causes of transplanted cell death: (i) membrane damage during injection, (ii) cell leakage from the injection site, and (iii) apoptosis due to loss of endogenous matrix. Using protein engineering and peptide-based assembly, we designed injectable hydrogels with modular cell-adhesive and mechanical properties. In a cervical contusion model, our hydrogel matrix resulted in a greater than 700% improvement in successful Schwann cell transplantation. The combination therapy of cells and gel significantly improved the spatial distribution of transplanted cells within the endogenous tissue. A reduction in cystic cavitation and neuronal loss were also observed with substantial increases in forelimb strength and coordination. Using an injectable hydrogel matrix, therefore, can markedly improve the outcomes of cellular transplantation therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available