4.8 Article

Breath figure-derived porous semiconducting films for organic electronics

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 6, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz1042

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. AFOSR [FA9550-18-1-0320]
  2. Northwestern University MRSEC [NSF DMR-1720139]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1504625]
  4. Youth Backbone Teacher Training Program in Henan province [2017GGJS021]
  5. Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology Experimental (SHyNE) Resource [NSF NNCI-1542205]
  6. MRSEC program at the Materials Research Center [NSF DMR-1720139]
  7. International Institute for Nanotechnology (IIN)
  8. Keck Foundation
  9. State of Illinois, through the IIN
  10. Flexterra Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Porous semiconductor film morphologies facilitate fluid diffusion and mass transport into the charge-carrying layers of diverse electronic devices. Here, we report the nature-inspired fabrication of several porous organic semiconductor-insulator blend films [semiconductor: P3HT (p-type polymer), C8BTBT (p-type small-molecule), and N2200 (n-type polymer); insulator: PS] by a breath figure patterning method and their broad and general applicability in organic thin-film transistors (OTFTs), gas sensors, organic electrochemical transistors (OECTs), and chemically doped conducting films. Detailed morphological analysis of these films demonstrates formation of textured layers with uniform nanopores reaching the bottom substrate with an unchanged solid-state packing structure. Device data gathered with both porous and dense control semiconductor films demonstrate that the former films are efficient TFT semiconductors but with added advantage of enhanced sensitivity to gases (e.g., 48.2%/ppm for NO2 using P3HT/PS), faster switching speeds (4.7 s for P3HT/PS OECTs), and more efficient molecular doping (conductivity, 0.13 S/m for N2200/PS).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available