4.8 Article

Diastereo- and Enantioselective Catalytic Radical Oxysulfonylation of Alkenes in β,γ-Unsaturated Ketoximes

Journal

CHEM
Volume 6, Issue 7, Pages 1692-1706

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.03.024

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21722203, 21831002, 21801120, 21803047, 21933004]
  2. Shenzhen Special Funds [JCYJ20170412152435366]
  3. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Catalysis [2020B121201002]
  4. Shenzhen Nobel Prize Scientists Laboratory Project [C17783101]
  5. SUSTech Special Fund for the Construction of High-Level Universities [G02216303]
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M650147]
  7. Warshel Institute for Computational Biology funding from Shenzhen City
  8. Shenzhen San-Ming Project [SZSM201809085]
  9. Warshel Institute for Computational Biology funding from Longgang District

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The asymmetric radical-initiated difunctionalization of internal alkenes, which creates two vicinal stereocenters, has been a significant synthetic challenge despite the tremendous progress achieved for terminal alkenes. This is attributable to the common stepwise mechanism that involves an initial free radical addition to the alkene in a nonstereoselective fashion. We report here the first asymmetric radical 1,2-oxysulfonylation of both terminal and internal aryl alkenes in beta,gamma-unsaturated ketoximes in the presence of copper(I)cinchona alkaloid-based sulfonamide catalyst The experimental and computational mechanistic studies collectively support a Cu-II-Cu-I mechanism featuring fast, reversible addition of sulfonyl radicals to alkenes and subsequent rate- and stereo-determining C-O bond formation, namely, a scenario under Curtin-Hammett kinetic control. The method provides a robust platform for collective synthesis of a diverse array of valuable chiral sulfonyl-containing building blocks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available