4.6 Article

Electrolyte design for LiF-rich solid-electrolyte interfaces to enable high-performance microsized alloy anodes for batteries

Journal

NATURE ENERGY
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages 386-397

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41560-020-0601-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) through Battery500 Consortium [DE-EE0008202]
  2. US DOE Office of Science User Facility at Brookhaven National Laboratory [DE-SC0012704]
  3. ARL Enterprise for Multiscale Modeling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium batteries with Si, Al or Bi microsized (>10 mu m) particle anodes promise a high capacity, ease of production, low cost and low environmental impact, yet they suffer from fast degradation and a low Coulombic efficiency. Here we demonstrate that a rationally designed electrolyte (2.0 M LiPF6 in 1:1 v/v mixture of tetrahydrofuran and 2-methyltetrahydrofuran) enables 100 cycles of full cells that contain microsized Si, Al and Bi anodes with commercial LiFePO4 and LiNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 cathodes. Alloy anodes with areal capacities of more than 2.5 mAh cm(-2) achieved >300 cycles with a high initial Coulombic efficiency of >90% and average Coulombic efficiency of >99.9%. These improvements are facilitated by the formation of a high-modulus LiF-organic bilayer interphase, in which LiF possesses a high interfacial energy with the alloy anode to accommodate plastic deformation of the lithiated alloy during cycling. This work provides a simple yet practical solution to current battery technology without any binder modification or special fabrication methods. Chunsheng Wang and colleagues develop an electrolyte strategy to enable the use of commercially available microsized alloys, such as Si-Li, as high-performance battery anodes. They ascribe its success to the formation of robust LiF-rich layers as the solid-electrolyte interface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available