4.6 Article

Oxidation Stability of Organic Redox Mediators as Mobile Catalysts in Lithium-Oxygen Batteries

Journal

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 2122-2129

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00883

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Samsung Research Funding & Incubation Center of Samsung Electronics [SRFC-MA1702-05]
  2. Human Resources Development Program of a Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant - Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy of the Korean government [20184010201720]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [21A20151513223] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Employing organic redox mediators (ORMs) for lithium-oxygen (Li-O-2) batteries has emerged as an important strategy to suppress charging overpotentials. Judicious molecular designs of ORMs can also tailor their redox potential and electron-transfer rate to optimize the catalytic efficiency. However, the stability of ORMs in Li-O-2 cells was scarcely studied. Here, the catalytic efficiency and stability of several important ORMs are assessed through in situ gas analysis and reactivity tests with singlet oxygen. Some well-known ORMs are detrimentally decomposed during the first cycle in Li-O-2 cells, whereas nitroxyl-radical-based ORMs bear the most stable and efficient response. Analogous nitroxyl-radical derivatives further increase round-trip energy efficiency and electron-transfer kinetics. This study underlines chemical stability aspects of ORMs, which are mandatory for the long-term cyclability in Li-O-2 cells. We emphasize that besides the importance of ORMs in these systems and their proper selection, an effective operation of Li-O-2 cells depends also strongly on the stability of the carbonaceous cathodes and the electrolyte solutions. The stability of all the components in these systems is inter-related.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available