4.1 Article

A visual SLAM method based on point-line fusion in weak-matching scene

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1729881420904193

Keywords

Mobile robot; simultaneous localization and mapping; point-line fusion; reprojection error

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [1708085MF146]
  2. university synergy Innovation Prograln of Anhui Province [GXXT-2019-003]
  3. special fund for basic scientific research in central colleges and universities [ACAIM190102]
  4. Project of Innovation Team of Ministry of Education of China [IRT17R32]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Visual simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) is well-known to be one of the research areas in robotics. There are many challenges in traditional point feature-based approaches, such as insufficient point features, motion jitter, and low localization accuracy in low-texture scenes, which reduce the performance of the algorithms. In this article, we propose an RGB-D SLAM system to handle these situations, which is named Point-Line Fusion (PLF)-SLAM. We utilize both points and line segments throughout the process of our work. Specifically, we present a new line segment extraction method to solve the overlap or branch problem of the line segments, and then a more rigorous screening mechanism is proposed in the line matching section. Instead of minimizing the reprojection error of points, we introduce the reprojection error based on points and lines to get a more accurate tracking pose. In addition, we come up with a solution to handle the jitter frame, which greatly improves tracking success rate and availability of the system. We thoroughly evaluate our system on the Technische Universitat Munchen (TUM) RGB-D benchmark and compare it with ORB-SLAM2, presumably the current state-of-the-art solution. The experiments show that our system has better accuracy and robustness compared to the ORB-SLAM2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available